<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion

dc.authorid0000-0001-7862-2983
dc.contributor.authorÇelikoğlu, Mevlüt
dc.contributor.authorOktay, Hüsamettin
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:52:38Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:52:38Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000330836700012
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23460730
dc.description.abstractThis prospective study investigated the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of a mini maxillary protractor appliance in class III subjects with maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion and compared these changes with those of untreated, well matched control sample with normal occlusions. Twenty patients with class III malocclusion (mean age 11.10.8 years) and 20 subjects with normal occlusion (mean age 10.90.4 years) were included to this study. The class III subjects were treated with the mini maxillary protractor appliance, and the others were used as control subjects. Paired t-test and Students t-test were used to determine the within- and between-group differences, respectively. In the study group, the maxilla moved forward (SNA, 2.0 degrees and AY, 2.4mm) (P < 0.001) with a slight rotation of palatal and occlusal planes (SNPP, 0.8 degree and SNOP, 0.7 degree) (P > 0.05). The mandible displaced backwards and downwards (SNB, 1.1 degrees; SND, 0.9 degree; BY, 0.9mm and PogY, 0.3mm; P < 0.001). These movements in the maxilla and mandible caused a significant improvement in intermaxillary sagittal relationship (ANB, 3.0 degrees; Convexity, 6.3 degrees; Wits, 4.6mm; P < 0.001). The maxillary incisors moved forward (2.2 degrees) while the mandibular ones backward (1.9 degrees). The improvement in overjet was 5.0mm, and 66.1 per cent of this change (3.3mm) was skeletal (AY; 2.4mm and BY; 0.9mm), and the remaining (1.7mm) dentoalveolar (U1NA; 0.9mm and L1-NB; 0.8mm). The change in LsE measurement was more in the study group (2.1mm), and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
dc.identifier.citationÇelikoğlu, M. ve Oktay, H. (2014). Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 86-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt006
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjt006
dc.identifier.endpage92
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage86
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2436
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMalocclusion
dc.subjectMaxillary Protraction
dc.subjectDental
dc.titleEffects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Oktay, Husamettin-2014.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text