<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three different implants

dc.authorid0000-0001-6742-8464
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Harun
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:26Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:26Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000361894200050
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25801063
dc.description.abstractWe have read the biomechanical study entitled ‘Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three different implants.’ By John A. Scolaro et al. with great interest in the issue of Injury 45(12), (2014), 2040–2044 [1]. We would like to congratulate the authors for their valuable biomechanical study. However, we would like to raise an important issue about the bone models used in the study. According to the official website of the company, bone models used in this biomechanical study (model number 1028, Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, WA) are made of foam cortical shell which include cancellous inner material. It is highlighted that they are ideal for large-scale surgical skills courses or different exercises [2]. The studies investigating the biomechanical properties of the implants or surgical methods of the humerus bone are usually performed with the fourth generation Sawbones [3,4]. These biomechanical models (model number 3404, Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, WA) are producted for the use of biomechanical testing according to the official website of the company [5]. We would like to share this technical detail with the authors and the readers. We believe that using biomechanical test materials that are used as an alternative testing medium to human cadaver bone would provide a more reliable and valuable experiment. Once again, we congratulate the authors.
dc.identifier.citationMutlu, S., Mutlu, H. ve Erdil, M. (2015). Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three different implants. Injury, 46(8), 1696-1697. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.008
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.008
dc.identifier.endpage1697
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383
dc.identifier.issn1879-0267
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1696
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2705
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofInjuryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğer
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.subjectPlate
dc.subjectFixation
dc.subjectHumerus
dc.subjectBiomechanical
dc.titlePlate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three different implants
dc.typeLetter

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
erdil, mehmet erdil-2015.pdf
Size:
152.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Tam Metin / Full Text